Report #2

I recently asked Carl if he would comment about regeneration in Digbeth:

“Whilst regeneration of Digbeth can be a good thing I believe that it must integrate sensitively with the historic landscape and work carefully with established manufacturing businesses and licensed premises especially. Digbeth and Deritend are working areas and I am concerned that both are in danger of being transformed into another part of ‘apartment Birmingham’, an entity which has no connection with the past and which does not have an affinity with manufacturing and pubs.” (Carl Chinn, June 2008).

Carl highlights concerns that many of us are presently tackling and taking up issue with.

The Big City Plan will affect the lives of all those living and working inside the middle ring road for at least the next fifteen years. This process is not unique to Digbeth. Other towns in the West Midlands are undergoing comparable changes and in every industrial city in Britain we see similar patterns of transformation in the name of regeneration.

Common distaste for regeneration stems from the failure of Governments to acknowledge the selling out of British manufacturing and the ongoing denial of a working class supports and expands this ignorance. The instrumentalised decline of industry outmoded the labouring population of Britain, leaving traditional trades and skills surplus to requirement in a working climate based on commerce alone. The infiltration of such business systems destroying workers solidarity and now eating into the core of national services- service no longer a duty or helpful action, but a measurable commodity.

Industrial belts like Digbeth, in the wake of British industry, are earmarked for branding as ‘lifestyle quarters’, the new industry of Digbeth- the ‘Creative and Cultural’. Existing businesses that do not correspond with the desired lifestyle stereotype are encouraged to diversify and buy into imagined communities rather than finding support in their existing state. This state of flux and impending decline sends visual messages to onlookers who then back stark regeneration rather than renovation and restoration as an option for existing local enterprise.

Digbeth’s ‘Creative and Cultural’ status and the inevitable expansion of the Custard factory will continue to effect the immediate location and the working community. This brings into question not only the historical context, but the focus that is now put on artistic labour and the influence this will have on trades excluded from the ‘Creative’ sector. The arts and the art not’s. The elevation of the ‘Creative’ role will further alienate the function of the worker. How will the arts funded under the conditions of Bourgeois reality cope with an essentially contradictive environment that is fundamentally hostile to art?  (RHR July 2008)